American Apparel Stands Up for Immigrant Workers, Sexiness

Controversial clothiers American Apparel has released a provocative new ad, eschewing scantily clad Lolitas in favor of a statement on immigration reform. As the New York Times reports, “In a new series of ads, American Apparel is moving in a political direction. The cause is immigration reform, and the ads say in part that the status quo ‘amounts to an apartheid system’ and should be overhauled to create a legal path for undocumented workers to gain citizenship in the United States.”

Continue reading American Apparel Stands Up for Immigrant Workers, Sexiness

Above the Law

In the latest round of “How dare you think we’d do this on purpose!” the White House has revealed that as many as 10 million e-mails from March to October 2003 may be permanently lost.

All White House e-mails are required to be preserved for official archiving by the Federal Records Act. However, the current administration abandoned the electronic record-keeping system of the Clinton administration, replacing it with, well, nothing substantive. As a Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW) lawsuit revealed, the only safeguard in place for preserving deleted e-mails were backup tapes containing snapshots of the White House servers at given moments in time.

In response to a court order, the White House has now admitted that those tapes were routinely recycled. But that’s ok, right? It’s not like anything important happened during time period.

Continue reading Above the Law

So Mr. Darcy Walks Into a Parlor…

We often hear that humor, unlike wine, doesn’t age well. Rob the joke of its context, the argument goes, and it’s often stripped of its ability to make the listener laugh. Barbs rooted in the details of their day wither—think of old political cartoons, the fine points of which often elude us, as this example shows. (Beyond the fact that the anthropomorphic bull has a drinking problem, I’m not too sure what’s going on.)

But other themes are universal, and thus timeless. Love, debt, arrogance and mortification about what your family just said in public have been with us throughout history. These themes lie at the heart of Pride and Prejudice, a warm, humanistic novel that takes great delight in puncturing our shared human frailties.

The book’s plot uses a standard romantic-comedy framework. Indeed, the novel, written by Jane Austen in 1813, can credibly claim to have invented the mold. There’s hatred, then love, obstacles and misunderstandings, all with a big, happy ending to tie it together.

But what registers most is the wit. Austen’s characters benefit from the loquacious style of their time. They deliver ornate insults, the kind that take a minute to register and a lifetime to rebut. The excess courtesy of the era helps to inspire the comedy of manners, as indirectness and excess flattery establish a perpetual contrast between the superficial politeness of the speech and the sharp barbs contained within.

That humor is hard to capture in excerpts, as its effect is cumulative, building up through keen characterization and a number of perfectly expressed (and often absurd) characters. It’s abundant in the book, however, and retains the ability to make the reader laugh out loud, even after nearly 200 years.

Huckabee: Amend Constitution to Meet God’s Standards

As Think Progress reports, Presidential candidate Mike Huckabee announced at a recent campaign event:

I have opponents in this race who do not want to change the Constitution. But I believe it’s a lot easier to change the Constitution than it would be to change the word of the living God. And that’s what we need to do is amend the Constitution so it’s in God’s standards rather than trying to change God’s standards so it lines up with some contemporary view of how we treat each other and how we treat the family.

(Emphasis theirs. They also have a link to a video.)

Ironically, “Jesus!” is the best response I can muster to this one.

Add this quote next to the sordid Wayne Dumond affair when trying to convince your Republican friends not to vote for him.

Spread the Wealth

The New York Times has an interesting article on new ideas for aiding the developing world, focusing on economist Lant Prichett, who argues for increasing opportunities for workers in developing nations to work in wealthy countries. By freeing labor from the boundaries that have largely been lifted from the flow of goods, we can have a huge impact on alleviating global poverty.

The argument raises some caveats; it’s uncertain how the logistics of moving and housing vast amounts of people would be overcome. Also, I remain skeptical that guest worker programs wouldn’t be conduits to exploitation—look at how laborers in “Right to Work” states compare to the unionized counterparts.

The article provides a welcome counterpoint to the nastiness illuminating much of the current “debate” about immigration in the United States, though. After all, Americans aren’t more worthy for having been born here; those born in developing nations didn’t choose their suffering. Why someone should starve to respect the sanctity of our borders is beyond me.